Lenovo
6TH YR(1228.8TB NVME QLC)PACK UNIFIED COMPLETE
In Stock
Lenovo 5WS7C25126 1,228.8 TB NVMe QLC Pack | Enterprise Storage
Lenovo
MPN: 5WS7C25126
$17,927.91$19,659.00
Free shipping on orders over $500
Authorized Dealer — Full manufacturer warranty
Key Features
- Lenovo 5WS7C25126 Unified Complete pack
- 1,228.8 TB NVMe QLC capacity package
- 6th-year coverage term
- Enterprise storage lifecycle planning
- Unified storage environment support
- Capacity-heavy deployment fit
- Protect storage roadmaps with 1,228.8 TB NVMe QLC capacity
- Extend lifecycle coverage via 6th-year complete pack entitlement
Support dense storage estates with Lenovo 5WS7C25126, a 6th-year Unified Complete pack centered on 1,228.8 TB of NVMe QLC capacity. It is designed for enterprise teams that need to keep long-range storage planning intact while maintaining a clear vendor-backed path for coverage and lifecycle management.
At this scale, the advantage is control. A defined Lenovo part number, a substantial capacity package, and a fixed coverage term make it easier to align procurement, budgeting, and refresh planning across complex infrastructure environments. That matters when storage is tied to production workloads, retention requirements, and multi-year capital planning.
Compared with lower-tier alternatives, this package is built for organizations that value certainty over improvisation. It helps reduce planning gaps, supports unified storage standardization, and gives infrastructure leaders a cleaner way to manage capacity commitments over time.
Ideal For
- Managing long-term coverage for unified enterprise storage platforms
- Supporting capacity planning for large data retention environments
- Standardizing procurement across Lenovo storage deployments
- Maintaining predictable lifecycle coverage for production storage estates
Why This Product
- 16th-year coverage versus shorter-term support packs
- 21,228.8 TB capacity package versus midrange entitlements
- 3Lenovo part-numbered procurement versus generic coverage
- 4Unified complete fit versus fragmented storage planning



